The Father, the Son, the Holy Hypocrite

The Father, the Son, the Holy Hypocrite


It seems to me that all monotheisms and the majority of faiths possess a strong aversion and sensitization towards the genitalia especially the females; I for one do not share this repugnant prejudice. I do nevertheless grasp that virtually the entire plethora of religious scripture all attain this parallel quality, and deem the birth canal is meant for but one tedious purpose. This is one of the numerous reasons that any pious doctrine especially the monotheisms will never be compatible with feminism. This is also one of my reasons that I do not consider in any sense Jesus was an ethical or even tolerable human-being. A theist apologist will make the exhausting and refutable assertion that Jesus was a peacenik that abolished the illogical, chauvinist, dim-witted laws of the Old Testament; I will prove this to be false and show Jesus as he truly was a man who preached nothing but schismatic and sometimes false hypocrisies.
The initial allegation of the Christian defender will make is the one I will take the liberty to demonstrate frivolous is the proclamation that Jesus came to eliminate the Old Testament doctrine.
Matthew 5:17
"Don't ever think that I came to set aside Moses' Teachings or the Prophets. I didn't come to set them aside but to make them come true.”
Following Jesus’ reason he is consequently a charlatan by definition, In the Old Testament it unambiguously forbids the exhibition of miracles on the Sabbath but we find in the New Testament he in fact does go to the shrine to heal a man when the high priest accused him of harnessing powers from Satan. He then contradicts an additional preaching by Moses in the barren region when he says “an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth” a undoubtedly barbaric and an request to our lower ape like nature. Then Jesus says “he who is without sin cast the first stone” which by that canon it would be extraordinarily tricky to incarcerate any misdeed no matter how immense the immoral act.
My next argument is that given that Jesus on no account eliminated the old laws he therefore was in cohesion with them and must have approved with them here is what he agreed with,

“Thou shall not suffer a witch to live.” Exodus 22:18

If someone entices you to worship another God kill them- Deuteronomy 13.6

Kill any false prophets- Deuteronomy 18.20

20:9 for every one that curseth his father or his mother shall be surely put to death: he hath cursed his father or his mother; his blood shall be upon him

I could maintain writing these evil verses all day, but I will come to an end and let you in conclusion make a decision for yourself whether Jesus was a civilized being or not. But I think we can terminate he was neither a passive figure nor a beacon of broadmindedness for the world. He has been the most schismatic bloody character in all of recorded human history.

You’re Contrarian Author,
Charles Brown