The False Prophet; Honest Abe

I would initially like to inquire a rhetorical question, what renowned man assumed the following quote?

“I will say then that I am not, nor ever have been in favor of bringing about in any way the social and political equality of the white and black races [the crowd applauds] – that I am not nor ever have been in favor of making voters or jurors of negroes, nor of qualifying them to hold office, nor to intermarry with white people, and I will say in addition to this that there is a physical difference between the black and white races which I believe will forever forbid the two races living together on terms of social and political equality. And inasmuch as they cannot so live, while they do remain together there must be the position of superior and inferior and I as much as any other man am in favor of having the superior position assigned to the white race.”

The utterance of the quotation came from none other then the white supremacist Abraham Lincoln. This is the same gentleman that also is distinguished as the father and leader of the black race. I will give the former ad-hominem validity later in this essay. This composition is to show that Mr. Lincoln was neither a companion towards blacks nor Southerners nor of the human race in general. His yearning for prosperity and fame infatuated him to do such heinous acts that the typical human would by no means be competent of committing.
Lincoln currently would be nothing less than a comrade towards the contemporary neo-Nazi faction and a sure inheritor to George Lincoln Rockwell’s legacy. The standard “Nazi apologist” adheres to the same doctrine as Lincoln himself did an absolute severance of the races, prohibition of interracial marriages, and the presumption that blacks run deficient against the mental capabilities of the Caucasian race thus making Africans ill-equipped to become American inhabitants.

Lincoln was in fact a loyal and prominent member of the American Colonialzation Society, this organization firmly believes that African-Americans could not ever grasp the same intellect as the “superior” Caucasian race therefore was not fit to subsist in America, and as a people be improved off in their respective homelands of Africa or the islands of South America. This racism can simply not be covered up because of the days he lived, and when you look at the heroics of Charles Sumner or the Grimke sisters these fowl words never left their lips, therefore it was a form of inexcusable bigotry.
This dictator also was not much a chum of the South as you can envision, his vigorous crusade of producing funds for his friends in the industrial railroad complex never subsided even after the eventual slaughter of hundreds of thousands of Southerners and blacks. Lincoln’s suspension of Habeas-Corpus of the U.S. was brutal and lead to the false imprisonment of thousands of dissident Northern news columnist and journalist, so we can say he was not much of a pal to the first amendment. He gave the official orders to William Tecumseh Sherman to wage a kind of warfare that was especially reserved for the likes of Ivan the Terrible this kind of warfare was known as “total war” A.K.A. the rape, pillaging, burning of the South and its inevitable spin into deficiency and poverty. On his rampage of the South a report was known that a group of abandoned slaves tried to follow his army up North only to be drowned in a lake by his men. Sherman was also not an acquaintance of Native Americans; Lincoln ordered the eradication of the Plains Indians to make way for Lincoln’s new transcontinental railroad operation. During this genocide Sherman made some of the most hateful, dogmatic, racist proclamations of the Plains Indians.

“Some Indians are thieving, killing rascals fit for death; all Indians look alike; therefore, to get some we must eliminate all the less destructive policy would be racial cleansing of the land.”

"I suppose the Sioux must be exterminated . . ."

"During an assault, the soldiers cannot pause to distinguish between male and female, or even discriminate as to age. As long as resistance is made, death must be meted out . . ."

"We must act with vindictive earnestness against the Sioux, even to their extermination, men, women and children."

Lincoln and his Northern invaders were most surely not on a abolitionist campaign against forced emancipation, but on a crusade of murder, rape, and annihilation of all that stood in his way of fortune.

You’re Contrarian Author,
Charles Brown

The Father, the Son, the Holy Hypocrite

The Father, the Son, the Holy Hypocrite


It seems to me that all monotheisms and the majority of faiths possess a strong aversion and sensitization towards the genitalia especially the females; I for one do not share this repugnant prejudice. I do nevertheless grasp that virtually the entire plethora of religious scripture all attain this parallel quality, and deem the birth canal is meant for but one tedious purpose. This is one of the numerous reasons that any pious doctrine especially the monotheisms will never be compatible with feminism. This is also one of my reasons that I do not consider in any sense Jesus was an ethical or even tolerable human-being. A theist apologist will make the exhausting and refutable assertion that Jesus was a peacenik that abolished the illogical, chauvinist, dim-witted laws of the Old Testament; I will prove this to be false and show Jesus as he truly was a man who preached nothing but schismatic and sometimes false hypocrisies.
The initial allegation of the Christian defender will make is the one I will take the liberty to demonstrate frivolous is the proclamation that Jesus came to eliminate the Old Testament doctrine.
Matthew 5:17
"Don't ever think that I came to set aside Moses' Teachings or the Prophets. I didn't come to set them aside but to make them come true.”
Following Jesus’ reason he is consequently a charlatan by definition, In the Old Testament it unambiguously forbids the exhibition of miracles on the Sabbath but we find in the New Testament he in fact does go to the shrine to heal a man when the high priest accused him of harnessing powers from Satan. He then contradicts an additional preaching by Moses in the barren region when he says “an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth” a undoubtedly barbaric and an request to our lower ape like nature. Then Jesus says “he who is without sin cast the first stone” which by that canon it would be extraordinarily tricky to incarcerate any misdeed no matter how immense the immoral act.
My next argument is that given that Jesus on no account eliminated the old laws he therefore was in cohesion with them and must have approved with them here is what he agreed with,

“Thou shall not suffer a witch to live.” Exodus 22:18

If someone entices you to worship another God kill them- Deuteronomy 13.6

Kill any false prophets- Deuteronomy 18.20

20:9 for every one that curseth his father or his mother shall be surely put to death: he hath cursed his father or his mother; his blood shall be upon him

I could maintain writing these evil verses all day, but I will come to an end and let you in conclusion make a decision for yourself whether Jesus was a civilized being or not. But I think we can terminate he was neither a passive figure nor a beacon of broadmindedness for the world. He has been the most schismatic bloody character in all of recorded human history.

You’re Contrarian Author,
Charles Brown